ilia
3b8b8e7d35
# Ticket: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine ## Ticket Information - **ID**: TICKET-005 - **Title**: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine - **Type**: Research - **Priority**: High - **Status**: Backlog - **Track**: Voice I/O - **Milestone**: Milestone 1 - Survey & Architecture - **Created**: 2024-01-XX ## Description Evaluate wake-word detection options and select one: - Compare openWakeWord and Porcupine for: - Hardware compatibility (Linux box/Pi/NUC) - Licensing requirements - Ability to train custom "Hey Atlas" wake-word - Performance and resource usage - False positive/negative characteristics ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Comparison matrix of wake-word options - [ ] Selected engine documented with rationale - [ ] Hardware requirements documented - [ ] Licensing considerations documented - [ ] Decision recorded in architecture docs ## Technical Details Options to evaluate: - openWakeWord (open source, trainable) - Porcupine (Picovoice, commercial) - Other open-source alternatives Considerations: - Custom wake-word training capability - Resource usage on target hardware - Latency requirements - Integration complexity ## Dependencies - TICKET-004 (architecture) - helpful but not required - Hardware availability for testing ## Related Files - `docs/WAKE_WORD_EVALUATION.md` (to be created) - `ARCHITECTURE.md` Reviewed-on: #3
58 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Ticket: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine
|
|
|
|
## Ticket Information
|
|
|
|
- **ID**: TICKET-005
|
|
- **Title**: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine
|
|
- **Type**: Research
|
|
- **Priority**: High
|
|
- **Status**: Backlog
|
|
- **Track**: Voice I/O
|
|
- **Milestone**: Milestone 1 - Survey & Architecture
|
|
- **Created**: 2024-01-XX
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
Evaluate wake-word detection options and select one:
|
|
- Compare openWakeWord and Porcupine for:
|
|
- Hardware compatibility (Linux box/Pi/NUC)
|
|
- Licensing requirements
|
|
- Ability to train custom "Hey Atlas" wake-word
|
|
- Performance and resource usage
|
|
- False positive/negative characteristics
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Comparison matrix of wake-word options
|
|
- [ ] Selected engine documented with rationale
|
|
- [ ] Hardware requirements documented
|
|
- [ ] Licensing considerations documented
|
|
- [ ] Decision recorded in architecture docs
|
|
|
|
## Technical Details
|
|
|
|
Options to evaluate:
|
|
- openWakeWord (open source, trainable)
|
|
- Porcupine (Picovoice, commercial)
|
|
- Other open-source alternatives
|
|
|
|
Considerations:
|
|
- Custom wake-word training capability
|
|
- Resource usage on target hardware
|
|
- Latency requirements
|
|
- Integration complexity
|
|
|
|
## Dependencies
|
|
|
|
- TICKET-004 (architecture) - helpful but not required
|
|
- Hardware availability for testing
|
|
|
|
## Related Files
|
|
|
|
- `docs/WAKE_WORD_EVALUATION.md` (to be created)
|
|
- `ARCHITECTURE.md`
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
Can start in parallel with LLM infra and MCP design. Needs hardware + microphone availability for testing.
|