ilia/atlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine #3

Merged
ilia merged 2 commits from vk/03e7-evaluate-and-sel into master 2026-01-05 21:34:40 -05:00
Conversation 0 Commits 2 Files Changed 3 +29 -2
ilia commented 2026-01-05 21:29:59 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link

Ticket: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine

Ticket Information

  • ID: TICKET-005
  • Title: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine
  • Type: Research
  • Priority: High
  • Status: Backlog
  • Track: Voice I/O
  • Milestone: Milestone 1 - Survey & Architecture
  • Created: 2024-01-XX

Description

Evaluate wake-word detection options and select one:

  • Compare openWakeWord and Porcupine for:
    • Hardware compatibility (Linux box/Pi/NUC)
    • Licensing requirements
    • Ability to train custom "Hey Atlas" wake-word
    • Performance and resource usage
    • False positive/negative characteristics

Acceptance Criteria

  • Comparison matrix of wake-word options
  • Selected engine documented with rationale
  • Hardware requirements documented
  • Licensing considerations documented
  • Decision recorded in architecture docs

Technical Details

Options to evaluate:

  • openWakeWord (open source, trainable)
  • Porcupine (Picovoice, commercial)
  • Other open-source alternatives

Considerations:

  • Custom wake-word training capability
  • Resource usage on target hardware
  • Latency requirements
  • Integration complexity

Dependencies

  • TICKET-004 (architecture) - helpful but not required
  • Hardware availability for testing

Related Files

  • docs/WAKE_WORD_EVALUATION.md (to be created)
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
# Ticket: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine ## Ticket Information - **ID**: TICKET-005 - **Title**: Evaluate and Select Wake-Word Engine - **Type**: Research - **Priority**: High - **Status**: Backlog - **Track**: Voice I/O - **Milestone**: Milestone 1 - Survey & Architecture - **Created**: 2024-01-XX ## Description Evaluate wake-word detection options and select one: - Compare openWakeWord and Porcupine for: - Hardware compatibility (Linux box/Pi/NUC) - Licensing requirements - Ability to train custom "Hey Atlas" wake-word - Performance and resource usage - False positive/negative characteristics ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Comparison matrix of wake-word options - [ ] Selected engine documented with rationale - [ ] Hardware requirements documented - [ ] Licensing considerations documented - [ ] Decision recorded in architecture docs ## Technical Details Options to evaluate: - openWakeWord (open source, trainable) - Porcupine (Picovoice, commercial) - Other open-source alternatives Considerations: - Custom wake-word training capability - Resource usage on target hardware - Latency requirements - Integration complexity ## Dependencies - TICKET-004 (architecture) - helpful but not required - Hardware availability for testing ## Related Files - `docs/WAKE_WORD_EVALUATION.md` (to be created) - `ARCHITECTURE.md`
ilia added 1 commit 2026-01-05 21:29:59 -05:00
ilia added 1 commit 2026-01-05 21:34:23 -05:00
ilia merged commit 3b8b8e7d35 into master 2026-01-05 21:34:40 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
ilia
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ilia/atlas#3
No description provided.
Delete Branch "vk/03e7-evaluate-and-sel"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?